23 July 2012

One beggar on James Street and one mother's thoughts on greed and love

-->
At 6:30pm on James Street last week, with a bellyful of cheap Indian food, I came across a young man sitting on the pavement with a cardboard sign at his feet. 'Homeless, please help'.

If you're living in Mumbai, I imagine that might seem unremarkable -- but I'm living in Perth, Western Australia. A very spacious modern city that is having, so we're constantly told, an economic boom. Big companies are digging up bits of Western Australia and selling it to other big companies that have factories, mainly in Asia, making Ipads and roofing sheets and jewellery and mining trucks. Apparently we're rolling in jobs and money. The place has a severe rash of construction sites building houses, apartments, shops, offices, hospitals, highway flyovers and railway underpasses.

And we have more homeless beggars now than ever before.

Many of the beggars around here look pretty fucked-up. They have a jumpy junkie look or a wasted wino look, or they're mooching around near the betting shop. Or they hang about the train station asking for money for fares but you just know they're going to spend it on their habit. Some people give them money anyway, out of pity, but I prefer not to. It's not that I don't care about them, and I certainly don't think their problems are their own fault. However I think giving them cash only supports their addiction to whatever kind of trouble they're in and doesn't really do them a favour. It isn't money they need, it's something more basic: love and care.

But the young man sitting on James Street seemed different. Something about him made me stop and bend down to look at him. He had a clear face, clear eyes and a red graze on the side of his face as if he'd been hit or fallen. As I rummaged for my purse, I asked him how he was.

'Hungry,' he said.

'Hungry,' I echoed, hoping he might tell me more.

'Yes, to be honest, hungry.'

'Would you like me to buy you something to eat?'

'Yeah.'

'What would you like?' (A really stupid question, in hindsight.)

'Uh...'

There was an awkward moment. Then I said, 'I don't really have time, anyway -- there's somewhere I have to be,' which was, more or less, the truth. I gave him what change I had and said, 'Will that help?'

'Yes,' he said. 'Thank you.' He gathered up his cardboard sign and faded backpack.

'Good luck,' I said, and walked away.

I didn't look back to see where he went. Along to the kebab shop or the food hall, I hoped. I'd looked him in the eye and felt he was for real, but maybe I was wrong. Either way I hoped that if a few people were kind, it would give him the strength to find his path.

Why am I not a beggar? How come, at least for the moment, I have what I need? Even if the bankers and dirty-energy peddlers somehow manage to avoid cooking the ecosystem as well as the books, my future is pretty uncertain. I really don't know how my life is going to turn out. Anything could happen. I could end up on the streets -- but I'm pretty sure I won't.

Why not? Because, luckily, I have a caring family who, although not perfect, do love me, and more-or-less accept me as I am (as difficult as that may sometimes be!). Because, luckily, I'm smart, well-educated and healthy. And because, from this fortunate base of love, security and knowledge, I've been able to reach out to others to make and maintain friendships. Because of all this luck, I've never gone hungry, never had nowhere to sleep, never had no-one to turn to. If my family or friends were in need I would take them in, and I'm pretty sure they'd do the same for me.

I don't think 'homeless' is the right word. Not having an owned or rented permanent shelter isn't the point. The real problem is that these unlucky souls are people-less. They don't have anyone to give them a home.

Maybe they have no family and, even more sadly, no friends. Or maybe they do have family but living rough seems a better choice. When I consider why someone would choose to shun the care and company of others to that extent, I don't think there's a real difference between that and being forced onto the streets. Maybe their family are abusive or neglectful or can't accept them as they are because of prejudice. Or maybe their family believe money is the only measure of value, and whatever it is the person can contribute (which might not be money) is not acceptable to their family, let alone to those who own or rent the roofs.

And I guess some homeless people do have loving family or friends who would give them a home, but they're too ashamed to ask, or too worried about putting themselves in the other person's debt. We're brought up to think it shameful to be anything other than self-reliant, and that to have no possessions is to have the lowest possible status, to be powerless.

Some people -- often they're young, vigorous and childless -- choose a form of homelessness, sleeping in communal squats, dumpster diving, scavenging the stuff suburbanites throw out on the kerbside, maybe appropriating supplies from the big corporate stores. Maybe growing vegetables, too. They're trying to create an alternative community that exists outside the economy and will survive the possibly imminent collapse of civilisation.

There's part of me that wants to join them. Living that way could be a lot of fun, and if civilisation does collapse it might be the only way to survive. But it doesn't feel right for me, somehow. I want something more stable, more peaceful. I'd like to live in a collective house, but I'd want it to be warm and comfortable, not a chilly, decrepit squat -- and, maybe this is selfish, but Virginia Woolf would back me up -- I'd want some privacy: if not a room of my own, at least a cubicle in which to arrange my few personal things and in which to write! And I have two kids, so any living arrangement would have to meet their needs too.

Anyway, I don't want civilisation to collapse. I want it to morph into something sustainable that works for all kinds of people -- parents and children and old people, people with disabilities and illnesses, people who are good with their hands and people who are good with their minds. People who can contribute ideas and services as well as people who can contribute goods.

I like living in a civilisation. I'm in favour of technology -- especially communications and medical technology -- and I'm in favour of change. With change comes the risk that some things will get worse, and a computer factory is not a garden (but maybe it could be!), but, let's face it, if not for technology I would be dead several times over. I wouldn't have survived childhood, let alone my daughter's breech birth, and even if I had lived, being a 46-year-old woman I'd most likely be illiterate, unenfranchised, in continual pain, married to someone I don't like, and knowing nothing about the world outside a radius of twenty miles or so.

Technology has created, at least in industrialised countries, the conditions necessary for the average person to think, at least some of the time, about the fate of the whole world instead of just worrying about how to fix their toothache or get their next meal. Because of communications technology (from the printing press to YouTube) everyone -- even in America! -- knows that there are people living in other countries, and in doorways, whose lives are different to theirs.

But we -- humanity, you, me -- we've got a plague. We know what it is. The clear-eyed young man begging on the street in a boomtown is one of its symptoms.

The plague is called greed. But where does greed come from? Why are we sick with it?

Greed is caused by fear. We're afraid -- and given our evolutionary and social history we have good reason to be afraid! -- that our needs for food, security, affiliation, etc, will not be met. We're afraid that if it came to the crunch no-one would look after us, because our past has convinced us there 's no-one who loves us unconditionally.

But unconditional love does exist. As a mother, daughter and friend, and as an occasional helper of beggars, I can vouch for it.

I try to put it into everything I write.

Can you feel it? Not in your head, not in your genitals, not in your belly. In your heart. Can you feel it there? A warm thing? A sense of connection, or of wanting connection?

If so, ask yourself, as I'm always asking myself: what am I using it for? What does my heart (not my other bits) tell me I should be doing? Am I doing what I should be doing? When am I doing it, and when am I not?

And when will I stop doing the things that feel wrong, the things I'm doing out of fear rather than love?

08 July 2012

Confuse your would-be enemies! My apple crumble recipe

In The Legend of Dick and Dom, Mannitol's evil Nan used her addictive apple crumble to enslave the adventurers (and a giant troll, if I remember rightly).

My crumble may not cause a dependency, but if you feed it to your would-be enemies it's sure to confuse and disorient them.

Jackson's apple crumble

Filling
  • 800 gram tin bakers apple or 4 or 5 big apples
  • a sprinkle of sugar if the apples are tart

Topping

  • 80 grams butter
  • 3/4 cup self-raising flour (I use half white half wholemeal, but whatever)
  • 1 1/2 teaspoons cinnamon
  • 3/4 cup brown sugar
  • 1 cup quick-cooking oats
  • 1/4 cup dessicated coconut

Method

  • Preheat the oven to 200 degrees C.
  • Melt the butter.
  • In a large bowl, mix all the other topping ingredients, then mix in the melted butter.
  • If you're using fresh apples, peel, core and slice them.
  • Spread the apples into a medium-sized baking dish or pie dish, eg 20cm square or 23cm round.
  • If the apples are tart you might want to sprinkle them with sugar.
  • Spread the topping over the apples and press it down a bit. 
  • Bake for 20 minutes until golden brown on top and smelling YUMMY.
It's nicest served warm with some kind of dairy blob, like custard, yoghurt or whipped cream. Or icecream if you must.

Rough measurements are OK.

Variations

  • Use other fruits. Apple and rhubarb is good but add some sugar!
  • Put a few cloves in with the apples.

02 July 2012

Perth Poetry Club, the mathematics of publicity, and Maslow's hierarchy of needs

Today was going to be my Day Off. It's a beautiful sunny day and I was going to wander out, maybe take in some art, maybe have coffee with a friend or see a movie. But I find myself thinking -- worrying! -- about Perth Poetry Club, the weekly community event I instigated in early 2009, inspired by Melbourne's weekly readings, the Dan Poets and the Spinning Room, and the way they brought poets together into a genuine community as well as giving poetry a chance to be heard.

I'm worrying about Perth Poetry Club because I've had enough of the responsibility of running it -- of being the manager, the one who makes sure that everything happens, the one people look to for direction, the one who fields most of the the questions and complaints as well as the thankyous.

It's not that I'm tired, or bored, or that I don't care. Quite the opposite: I have new ideas, I want to do new things, and the tasks involved in running a weekly show are getting in the way, consuming my energy. Here I was, planning to have a Day Off in the sunshine, and I've spent the whole morning and half the afternoon at my desk, thinking and writing about Perth Poetry Club and trying to figure out my next move.

Maybe I need to step off completely and walk away. Not just give away this task and that, not just step back and let others take the lead. I've been doing that for a while already and, weirdly, I feel more of a drain on my energy than I did when I was doing most of the jobs myself! That isn't a good sign. So perhaps I need to step right out of the organising group. Perhaps my presence in the group is holding back others as well as myself.

In late 2008 when I first had the idea, people said, 'a weekly reading won't work in Perth, there aren't enough people, it will be too much work. Try monthly or fortnightly.' Only one person (Helen Child) offered regular help. Eventually we found a venue (The Court Hotel), Allan 'antipoet' Boyd of radicalhack.com generously created visual imagery, a website and a striking poster, and the rest is history. In October 2009 we moved to The Moon Cafe, whose owner Georgia Mathieson provides not only good food and drink but a welcoming space for community arts and artists.

On a good Saturday, Perth Poetry Club is exactly what I wanted it to be, and what the slogan says -- 'where slams meet sonnets'. Well-known literary poets reading alongside unknown bloggers and street poets, and everything in between. Influencing each other and getting to know each other. Becoming friends. And sometimes getting reviewed in the press!

The naysayers had a point, though. It's been a lot of work. I think people who offer to help sometimes get a shock when they realise that what happens on the day of the event -- MCing, introducing luminous poets, waving your arms about, being photographed, selling books, collecting donations -- is only a small part of the story. It's like the deck of a ship with a band playing. Underneath, there's a greasy engine room and a whole lot of machinery and repetitive activity. And there will be someone doing the steering -- or at least overseeing the electronic navigation systems -- ideally, someone who can read charts and who knows the ways of icebergs.

Enough metaphor! I was talking about running a poetry event and how much work is involved. For example. Having featured poets each week is not just a matter of casually asking them -- not if you want them to turn up at the right time and put on a good show. (Thank you to Jake Dennis for your recent help with that.)

Looking after the money, which is contributed by the audience in good faith, is not just a matter of keeping a box of cash somewhere. There are spreadsheets. (Perth Poetry Club has been very lucky with this -- we've had a reliable treasurer, Elio Novello, from almost the beginning.)

And then there's publicity.

My approach to publicity (for Perth Poetry Club and anything else I do) is based on what I learned in my years as a volunteer with the Australian Breastfeeding Association, another community concern that needs a constant inflow of new people to keep it going.

I learned that publicity is mainly about having a catchy, descriptive name and image, providing just enough information, and getting it in front of as many people as possible as often as possible.

Publicity also means stepping outside your own headspace and realising that most people aren't interested in what you're doing. Maybe one in a thousand are interested enough in poetry to consider coming to a reading -- which means that to get one new person you have to make a thousand contacts.

Actually, it doesn't, because you target your publicity so it reaches those more likely to be interested. In the case of poetry this means the literary community, people who frequent libraries and bookshops, and the weird people you see at train stations. So let's be really optimistic and say one in a hundred are interested. Marketing theory says that, on average, people need to hear about something three times before they'll do anything about it. (Before you get cross about that, remember it's an average. Think bell curve.)

So if you want one new person a week you have to make three hundred contacts a week. In the right places. Sounds a lot... but it's not so bad, because you use technology and existing social and organisational networks to duplicate your contacts. You run off a whole bunch of flyers and leave them in as many places as you can. You send your publicity to another organisation and get them to publicise it. You use the viral power of social media. You find out who the right reporters are and send them media releases. You make a really good website (thanks, Allan) and get everyone to link it, and give it descriptive, literal keywords and titles (like 'Perth' and 'Poetry') so that Google searches find it.

Then, when the people turn up, you give them what they're after. It occured to me this morning that the reason Perth Poetry Club is so popular, especially with what we might call 'emerging' poets, is that being part of it helps them get what they're after at all the levels of Maslow's hierarchy of needs: physical, security, affiliation, personal power, self-actualisation. Starting from the most basic need:
  • Physical (food, shelter, sleep, etc). You can eat and drink and the venue is cosy (sometimes too cosy, admittedly). If you have no money someone will probably buy you a coffee and share their food with you. There is no obligation to pay -- the necessary money is provided by those who can. The venue is okay if you're disabled or come with a pram. The afternoon timeslot doesn't stop you from sleeping in or going to bed early.
  • Security. The event has a consistent format and happens at a consistent time, every week, so people know what to expect. The venue feels safe and casual: the decor and the people are friendly, arty and scruffy.
  • Affiliation. People feel included, feel a sense of belonging, feel that they have friends.
  • Personal power: this means the ability to make a difference with others and to be recognised for that. To be heard, to be applauded, to be given credit.
  • Self-actualisation, which means achieving, creating, using your skills.
I never wanted people to identify me with Perth Poetry Club. For a while, I guess, I identified with it, but I don't any more. It isn't my thing -- it's just something I started. I wanted to get a weekly poetry event going in Perth and then hand it on to others. Hopefully it will to continue to be successful... or, thinking more broadly, hopefully, the poets and poetry fans of Perth will continue to run a weekly event that is well-publicised, entertaining and welcoming, whatever it may be called.

As I try to edit this ramble of thought into something that hangs together well enough to publish, my phone rings. It's another arts organisation wanting to link up with Perth Poetry Club. The lady doesn't know me -- she got my number from the website. People more often email, but sometimes they need the reassurance of actually talking to a human before taking the risk of getting involved.

As Yeats said, 'In dreams begin responsibilities.' But the heck with that for the rest of the day. First, some hot soup. And then, a walk in the sunshine, and  perhaps a movie.